An army of powerful psychopaths

“Assholes: A Theory. Formally
stated, “The asshole (1) allows himself to enjoy special advantages and
does so systematically; (2) does this out of an entrenched sense of
entitlement; and (3) is immunized by his sense of entitlement against
the complaints of other people.”
“Offices and corporate environments
are crazy-making. The air is weird. You’re working within a structure
that has no moral compass and can only measure things like money, and
not things like proportion of staff who can still feel happiness or
percentage wanting to kill yourself in a staff meeting. There’s that
girl who’s on a diet but insists on bringing everyone cupcakes and
watching them eat the cupcakes no really I insist ha ha ha ha ha.
There’s the guy who runs in to work and leaves his sweaty bike shorts
under his desk where their moist funk exudes a mist that occludes his
office windows. Everyone’s mad” 



The environment is disturbingly familiar…

“According to psychologist Robert
Hare, about one in 100 members of the general population meet the
criteria for psychopathy. A lot of those are working in corporate
firms.”

…and the conclusions ring worryingly true.

“But if you are a socio/psychopath, you’re in luck! The
numbers don’t lie! You’re more likely to do well in a corporate
environment! Which is the kind of doing well that sociopaths LOVE THE
MOST! Being a sociopath or a psychopath is not quite as good a roll of
the dice in terms of statistical likelihood of corporate success as
being born white in an upper middle-class family, but it’s a decent
boost. And remember you can be both!”

 
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/06/why-it-pays-to-be-a-jerk/392066/

http://www.sbs.com.au/comedy/article/2016/06/10/office-environments-are-creating-army-powerful-psychopaths

The End of the Nation State. Brexit could be the harbinger of a post-national world.

“… there is a growing feeling among economists, political scientists and even national governments that the nation-state is not necessarily the best scale on which to run our affairs. We must manage vital matters like food supply and climate on a global scale, yet national agendas repeatedly trump the global good. At a smaller scale, city and regional administrations often seem to serve people better than national governments.”

I live in Switzerland. Here there is a smooth transition from local to national governance. The research seems to support the idea that a fractal, hierarchical, system allows people close to the issues to make the best choices.

“…Switzerland’s 26 cantons, for example, which have different languages and religions, meet Bar-Yam’s spatial stability test – except one. A French-speaking enclave in German-speaking Berne experienced the only major unrest in recent Swiss history. It was resolved by making it a separate canton, Jura, which meets the criteria.”

“… in any hierarchy, the person at the top
has to be able to get their head around the whole system. When systems
are too complex for one human mind to grasp… they must
evolve from hierarchies into networks where no one person is in charge.”

  

Unwieldy central government, restrictive and bureaucratic, is old hat. Technology must deliver agile, Peer 2 Peer, network alternatives.